![\"\"](\"http:\/\/www.revistahcsm.coc.fiocruz.br\/english\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/Screen-Shot-2023-01-16-at-7.29.59-AM.png\")
Sigmund Freud and Carl Jung<\/p><\/div>\n
The meanings of saying \u201cno\u201d can be philosophically and psychologically interpreted in very different ways. The philosopher Martin\u00a0Heidegger<\/span>\u00a0considered a negative judgment to be tied to an original experience of nothing. The psychologist Ren\u00e9 Spitz attributed the acquired capacity to say \u201cno\u201d to the acquisition of the so-called third psychic organizer, since it implies having learned the meaning of prohibition from parents and having lived a first manifestation of identification with them.<\/p>\n In the article The refused interpretation in Freud, Jung and beyound: What if the patient says \u201cno\u201d<\/a>, There was no literature about confronting the meaning of a refused interpretation in psychoanalysis and analytical psychology. The paper tries to figure out what is the consequence of a different attitude from an epistemological and a historical point of view.<\/p>\n This article is part of the\u00a0special issue\u00a0Transcultural histories of psychotherapies: new narratives<\/a>\u00a0(HCS-Manguinhos 29 suppl 1, 2022),\u00a0coordinated by professors Sonu Shamdasani (Health Humanities Centre\/University College London) and\u00a0\u00a0Cristiana Facchinetti (postgraduate Program in History of Sciences and Health\/Casa de Oswaldo Cruz\/Fiocruz).<\/p>\n Read more in HCS-Manguinhos:<\/p>\n Innamorati, Marco. The refused interpretation in Freud, Jung and beyond: what if the patient says \u201cno\u201d<\/a>. Hist\u00f3ria, Ci\u00eancias, Sa\u00fade-Manguinhos [online]. 2022, v. 29, suppl 1 [Accessed\u00a016 January 2023], pp. 109-121.<\/p>\n Las obsesiones antes de Freud<\/a>\u00a0Rafael Huertas analiza el concepto de \u201cobsesi\u00f3n\u201d antes y despu\u00e9s de Freud.<\/p>\n Freud para todos<\/a>\u00a0Este mes se cumplen 80 a\u00f1os de la muerte de Sigmund Freud.<\/p>\n
\nMarco Innamorati, PhD, PsyD, Professor of History and Philosophy of scientific concepts at University of Rome \u201cTor Vergata\u201d (Italy)\u00a0\u00a0tries to show how the consequences of refusing an interpretation can be very different within Freudian, Jungian, and other psychotherapeutic models.\u00a0 A \u201cno\u201d may imply in some cases a refutation of the model of reference, and in others less radical meanings.<\/p>\n